what running shoe is best?
What’s the best running shoe ?
This is an age-old debate. So Im going throw my 2 cents in. Iv also just recently released a blog on my website and email to my online runners regarding this very topic.
The ANSWER is whatever you feel is the best is the best running shoe. Every runner has specific needs due to gate , biomechanics , bodyweight , distance , simple feel and who am I kidding the look of the shoe.
Every brand now has short , middle , long and even a trail shoe in their line.
They all have different technology carbon this , mid foot cushion etc so it really comes down to trial and error. They are constantly upgrading their shoes so a change is sometimes as good as a holiday.
Hoka and on have been in my mind the trending shoes for the past 2 years and leading the way in the running technology department. With now Saucony jumping into the mix this year.
For years I ran in Asic's for long distance and Nike for short races.
Now I run in Hoka for all my long runs and have just bought a pair of on for short distances.
I tried a new balance through my Ironman journey, a great show but could never get comfortable in them.
I really believe that each shoe is suited to each individual. I love my Hoka’s. I'm a big boy and need that extra comfy ride especially in training but also like a close road feel for racing.
Here are some PRO / CONS FOR HOKA VS ON
Hoka Running Shoes:
Pros:
Plush Cushioning: Hoka shoes are known for their maximalist cushioning, providing unparalleled comfort and shock absorption, especially during long runs.
Smooth Ride: The oversized midsole of Hoka shoes creates a smooth and stable ride, reducing impact and fatigue on the legs and joints.
Excellent for Recovery Runs: Hoka shoes are great for recovery runs or easy-paced training runs, thanks to their cushioning and support, which can help alleviate fatigue and soreness.
Versatile Options: Hoka offers a wide range of models suitable for various foot types, running styles, and distances, allowing runners to find the perfect fit for their needs.
Cons:
Heavyweight: Some runners may find Hoka shoes to be on the heavier side due to their maximalist cushioning, which can feel cumbersome, especially during speed workouts or races.
Limited Ground Feel: The thick midsole of Hoka shoes may reduce ground feel and responsiveness, which could be a drawback for runners who prefer a more minimalist shoe or value a closer connection to the ground.
On Cloud Running Shoes:
Pros:
Lightweight and Responsive: On Cloud shoes are known for their lightweight design and responsive cushioning, providing a snappy and energetic ride that feels fast and efficient.
Excellent Energy Return: The CloudTec cushioning system of On Cloud shoes offers excellent energy return, propelling you forward with each stride and helping you maintain speed and momentum.
Versatile Performance: On Cloud shoes perform well across a variety of distances and paces, making them suitable for everything from tempo runs and intervals to long-distance training and racing.
Sleek and Stylish Design: On Cloud shoes feature a sleek and stylish design that appeals to both performance-oriented runners and fashion-conscious athletes.
Cons:
Limited Cushioning: Some runners may find the cushioning of On Cloud shoes to be insufficient, especially for longer distances or runners who require extra support and protection from impact.
Less Stability: The minimalistic design of On Cloud shoes may lack the stability and support needed for runners with pronation issues or those who prefer a more structured shoe.
In conclusion, both Hoka and On Cloud offer unique advantages and considerations for long-distance running, and the best choice ultimately depends on your individual preferences, running style, and performance goals. Whether you prioritize plush cushioning and comfort or lightweight responsiveness and speed, there's a shoe out there that's perfect for you.
What about barefoot you say… well that’s for another day.
9 weeks until GC marathon weekend ....... 63 days .... 9 long runs